JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.41 1061-1072 October 1998.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, B. E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, B. E. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Aging and High-Frequency Hearing Sensitivity

Terry L. Wiley 1
Karen J. Cruickshanks 1
David M. Nondahl 1
Ted S. Tweed 1
Ronald Klein 1

Barbara E. K. Klein 1

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison

tlwiley{at}facstaff.wisc.edu

As part of a large population-based study of hearing and aging, ultra highfrequency (9–20 kHz) threshold measures are reported for 3396 participants grouped by age (48–59 years, n=1233; 60–69 years, n=1031; 70–79 years, n=851; 80–92 years, n=281). Ultra high-frequency (UHF) thresholds were higher for older age groups. The percentage of unmeasurable responses also was significantly higher for older age groups and for higher frequencies in the UHF range. The observed age effects remained significant after adjusting for gender. In general, UHF thresholds were significantly higher for men compared to those for women at lower UHF frequencies (9–14 kHz), but were not significantly different by gender for the highest UHF frequencies (16, 18, and 20 kHz). After accounting for hearing loss at traditional audiometric frequencies (250–8000 Hz), the age effect still remained; even for comparable degrees of sensorineural hearing loss, participants in older age groups evidenced higher UHF thresholds.

KEY WORDS: aging, ultra high-frequency, hearing loss, presbycusis

Submitted on January 5, 1998
Accepted on March 16, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. I. Shotland, F. G. Ondrey, K. A. Mayo, and J. L. Viner
Recommendations for Cancer Prevention Trials Using Potentially Ototoxic Test Agents
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2001; 19(6): 1658 - 1663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. L. Meyskens Jr. and E. W. Gerner
Development of Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) as a Chemoprevention Agent
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 1999; 5(5): 945 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.