Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.41 355-373 April 1998.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cacace, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cacace, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Editors' Awards
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Central Auditory Processing Disorder in School-Aged Children

A Critical Review

Anthony T. Cacace 1
Dennis J. McFarland 2

1 Departments of Surgery and Neurology Albany Medical College Albany, NY
2 Wadsworth Center New York State Department of Health Albany, NY

anthony_cacace{at}ccgateway.amc.edu

The rationale to evaluate for central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) in schoolaged children is based on the assumption that an auditory-specific perceptual deficit underlies many learning problems including specific reading and language disabilities. A fundamental issue in this area is whether convincing empirical evidence exists to validate this proposition. Herein, we consider the issue of modality specificity by examining the extent to which reading, language, and attention disorders in schoolaged children involve perceptual dysfunctions limited to a single sensory modality. Difficulty in validating CAPD as a diagnostic label is due in large part to use of the unimodal inclusive framework, which has biased the diagnosis to favor sensitivity of test results over documenting the specificity of the deficit. Indeed, empirical research documenting modality-specific auditory-perceptual dysfunction in this population is scarce. Therefore, the existing literature on this topic has not clarified the "true" nature of the problem, and has left many questions about this disorder unanswered. It is argued that demonstrating modality specificity is one way to rule out supramodal disorders as explanations for observed dysfunction. Multimodal perceptual testing is one logical approach to help clarify this area of investigation.

KEY WORDS: central auditory processing disorder, dyslexia, dysphasia, attention deficit disorder, otitis media

Submitted on November 12, 1996
Accepted on November 17, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
C. A. Miller
Auditory Processing Theories of Language Disorders: Past, Present, and Future
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2011; 42(3): 309 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
C. R. Billiet and T. J. Bellis
The Relationship Between Brainstem Temporal Processing and Performance on Tests of Central Auditory Function in Children With Reading Disorders
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2011; 54(1): 228 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
J. Lagace, B. Jutras, and J.-P. Gagne
Auditory Processing Disorder and Speech Perception Problems in Noise: Finding the Underlying Origin
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2010; 19(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
School-Based IssuesHome page
J. Lagace, M. Belanger-Schaadt, J. Savard, and C.-J. Dubouloz
Interprofessional Approach to Auditory Processing Disorders
School-Based Issues, December 1, 2008; 9(4): 140 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fluency and Fluency DisordersHome page
L. R. LaSalle and R. D. Duginske
Auditory Discrimination Deficits in Boys Who Stutter: A Preliminary Investigation
Fluency and Fluency Disorders, August 1, 2008; 18(2): 69 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
D. A. DeBonis and D. Moncrieff
Auditory Processing Disorders: An Update for Speech-Language Pathologists
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 4 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
J. Gilmore and M. Vance
Teacher ratings of children's listening difficulties
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 2007; 23(2): 133 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
W. D. Keller, K. L. Tillery, and S. L. McFadden
Auditory Processing Disorder in Children Diagnosed With Nonverbal Learning Disability
Am J Audiol, December 1, 2006; 15(2): 108 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F.-G. Zeng, Y.-Y. Kong, H. J. Michalewski, and A. Starr
Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3050 - 3063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Atten DisordHome page
G. P. Hill
A role for the speech-language pathologist in multidisciplinary assessment and treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
J Atten Disord, August 1, 2000; 4(2): 69 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]