| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
psouza{at}u.washington.edu
Although multichannel compression systems are quickly becoming integral components of programmable hearing aids, research results have not consistently demonstrated their benefit over conventional amplification. The present study examined two confounding factors that may have contributed to this inconsistency in results: alteration of temporal information and audibility of speech cues. Recognition of linearly amplified and multichannel-compressed speech was measured for listeners with mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss and for a control group of listeners with normal hearing. In addition to the standard speech signal, which provided both temporal and spectral information, the listener's ability to use temporal information in a multichannel compressed signal was directly tested using a signal-correlated noise (SCN) stimulus. This stimulus consisted of a time-varying speech envelope modulating a two-channel noise carrier. It preserved temporal cues but provided minimal spectral information. For each stimulus condition, short-term level measurements were used to determine the range of audible speech. Multichannel compression improved speech recognition under conditions where superior audibility was provided by the twochannel compression system over linear amplification. When audibility of both linearly amplified and multichannel-compressed speech was maximized, the multichannel compression had no significant effect on speech recognition score for speech containing both temporal and spectral cues. However, results for the SCN stimuli show that more extreme amounts of multichannel compression can reduce use of temporal information.
KEY WORDS: hearing aid, multichannel, compression, temporal cues, audibility
Submitted on December 19, 1996
Accepted on October 8, 1997
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Chung, J. Tufts, and L. Nelson Modulation-Based Digital Noise Reduction for Application to Hearing Protectors to Reduce Noise and Maintain Intelligibility Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, February 1, 2009; 51(1): 78 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. W. Henning and R. A. Bentler The Effects of Hearing Aid Compression Parameters on the Short-Term Dynamic Range of Continuous Speech J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 471 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Jenstad and P. E. Souza Temporal Envelope Changes of Compression and Speech Rate: Combined Effects on Recognition for Older Adults J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1123 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Poulsen, T. W. Picton, and T. Paus Age-Related Changes in Transient and Oscillatory Brain Responses to Auditory Stimulation in Healthy Adults 19-45 Years Old Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1454 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Chung, M. C. Killion, and L. A. Christensen Ranking Hearing Aid Input-Output Functions for Understanding Low-, Conversational-, and High-Level Speech in Multitalker Babble J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 304 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. E. Souza and K. T. Boike Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2006; 49(1): 138 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. E. Souza Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2002; 6(4): 131 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Ricketts Directional Hearing Aids Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2001; 5(4): 139 - 176. [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |
