JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.41 239-248 April 1998.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stathopoulos, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stathopoulos, E. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Varied Vocal Intensity on Ventilation and Energy Expenditure in Women and Men

Bridget A. Russell 1
Frank J. Cerny 2

Elaine T. Stathopoulos 2

1 State University of New York College at Fredonia
2 State University of New York at Buffalo

russell{at}fredonia.edu

This study was completed to determine how ventilatory responses change by means of speech reading at three different sound pressure levels (SPL) as compared to quiet breathing prior to each task. The energy required to alter SPL was also studied and compared to energy expenditures during a quiet breathing condition. Twenty-four adults (12 women, 12 men) were studied while reading a standard passage at low, comfortable, and high SPLs for 7 minutes with quiet breathing periods between each task to achieve respiratory steady state and serve as a control to which the reading tasks were compared. The last 2 minutes of exhaled air for all speaking and quiet breathing tasks were collected using a Hans Rudolph mouth breathing face mask. A Sensor Medics Vmax 29TM series diagnostic instrument system measured all ventilatory responses and energy expenditures. Volume and timing alterations in ventilation were characterized by measuring tidal volume (VT), inspiratory time (TI), inspiratory flow rate (VT/TI), and expiratory time (TE). Average ventilation, energy expenditure, and adequacy of ventilation were measured using minute ventilation (VWE), oxygen consumption VWO2), carbon dioxide production (VWCO2), and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (end-tidal PETCO2). Results indicated volume, timing, ventilation, and energy expenditure values remained closest to quiet breathing values for the comfortable SPL. Volume, ventilation, and energy expenditure were significantly greater for the high SPL and lower for the low SPL, compared to the baseline steady state, indicating that the low SPL causes a ventilatory deficit that was found to be paid back at the end of the speech task during the quiet breathing period. These results demonstrate that an individual's comfortable SPL is the least energyrequiring way to speech breathe. As SPL rises above or below comfortable SPL, speech breathing requires more energy.

KEY WORDS: vocal intensity, adults, ventilation, homeostasis, energy expenditure

Submitted on May 12, 1997
Accepted on October 27, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. Collyer and P. J. Davis
Effect of facemask use on respiratory patterns of women in speech and singing.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 412 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Oberweger and F. Goller
The metabolic cost of birdsong production
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3379 - 3388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.