JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.41 94-106 February 1998.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hnath-Chisolm, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boothroyd, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hnath-Chisolm, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boothroyd, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Age-Related Changes on a Children's Test of Sensory-Level Speech Perception Capacity

Theresa E. Hnath-Chisolm 1
Erin Laipply 1

Arthur Boothroyd 2

1 University of South Florida Tampa
2 City University of New York

Normative data, as a function of age, were obtained on a test designed to assess sensory-level speech perception capacity, the Three-Interval Forced-Choice Test of Speech Pattern Contrast Perception, otherwise known as THRIFTSPAC (or THRIFT for short). Performance under the input modalities of hearing alone, speechreading alone, and the two combined was measured in 44 normally developing children between the ages of 5 years 7 months and 10 years 9 months. Resultsrevealed that within each condition there were significant influences of age on performance for children below age 7 years. These changes appeared to be related to cognitive and, possibly, to phonological development. Implications for the clinical implementation of THRIFT are discussed.

KEY WORDS: speech perception, children, assessment, sensory level, multimodality

Submitted on August 16, 1996
Accepted on July 29, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. Bertoncini, W. Serniclaes, and C. Lorenzi
Discrimination of Speech Sounds Based Upon Temporal Envelope Versus Fine Structure Cues in 5- to 7-Year-Old Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2009; 52(3): 682 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Petrini and S. Tagliapietra
Cognitive Maturation and the Use of Pitch and Rate Information in Making Similarity Judgments of a Single Talker
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 485 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
S. Scollie, R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, D. Laurnagaray, S. Beaulac, and J. Pumford
The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 159 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
K. Yuet Sheung Lee, Sung Nok Chiu, and C. A. van Hasselt
Tone Perception Ability of Cantonese-Speaking Children
Language and Speech, December 1, 2002; 45(4): 387 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.