JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.40 1220-1231 December 1997.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGregor, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGregor, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Trochaic Template Use in Early Words and Phrases

Karla K. McGregor 1
Amy C. Johnson 1
1 Northwestern University Evanston, IL

mcgregor{at}casbah.acns.nwu.edu

The speech of twenty normally developing children whose linguistic development spanned four MLU stages was recorded. The weak syllable productions in their spontaneous and elicited words and phrases were examined. The children demonstrated more frequent use of weak syllables that occurred in trochaic (strong + weak) than iambic (weak + strong) patterns. The constraint on iambs was not absolute; even children in MLU Stage I produced weak syllables in iambs occasionally. Also, it was not a constraint on lexical representations as the same pattern was evinced for word combinations. Weakly stressed articles were omitted significantly more often from noun phrases that were iambic than from those that were trochaic. These data suggest that a pattern of the form strong syllable + optional weak syllable [S(W)] serves as a template for multisyllabic productions, whether mono- or multimorphemic. With increasing MLU, S(W) template use declined and control of timing distinctions between weak and strong syllables became more adult-like. We conclude that the trochee may function as either an optimal representational unit or as an optimal timing unit for early syllable sequences. The trochaic template is invoked when the complexity of an intended utterance exceeds the child's resources for planning and production.

KEY WORDS: template, trochaic, iambic, weak syllables, articles

Submitted on August 6, 1996
Accepted on February 26, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. Swingley
Contributions of infant word learning to language development
Phil Trans R Soc B, December 27, 2009; 364(1536): 3617 - 3632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 First LanguageHome page
K. Hansson, U. Nettelbladt, and L. B. Leonard
Indefinite Articles and Definite Forms in Swedish Children with Specific Language Impairment
First Language, October 1, 2003; 23(3): 343 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
R. L Shea and A. A Tyler
The effectiveness of a prosodic intervention on children's metrical patterns
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 2001; 17(1): 55 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.