JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.40 183-199 February 1997.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fryauf-Bertschy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Woodworth, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fryauf-Bertschy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Woodworth, G. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cochlear Implant Use by Prelingually Deafened Children

The Influences of Age at Implant and Length of Device Use

Holly Fryauf-Bertschy 1
Richard S. Tyler 1
Danielle M. R. Kelsay 1
Bruce J. Gantz 1

George G. Woodworth 1

1 The University of Iowa Department of Otolaryngology Iowa City

hfryauf{at}otolaryngology-po.oto.uiowa.edu

This study focused on the long-term speech perception performances of 34 prelingually deafened children who received multichannel cochlear implants manufactured by Cochlear Corporation. The children were grouped by the age at which they received cochlear implants and were characterized by the amount of time they used their devices per day. A variety of speech perception tests were administered to the children at annual intervals following the connection of the external implant hardware. No significant differences in performance are evident for children implanted before age 5 compared to children implanted after age 5 on closed-set tests of speech perception ability. All children demonstrated an improvement in performance compared to the pre-operative condition. Open-set word recognition performance is significantly better for children implanted before age 5 compared to children implanted after age 5 at the 36-month test interval and the 48-month test interval. User status, defined by the amount of daily use of the implant, significantly affects all measures of speech perception performance except pattern perception.

KEY WORDS: cochlear implants, prelingually deafened children, age of implant, amount of use

Submitted on January 3, 1995
Accepted on August 21, 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
L. Duchesne, A. Sutton, and F. Bergeron
Language Achievement in Children Who Received Cochlear Implants Between 1 and 2 Years of Age: Group Trends and Individual Patterns
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2009; 14(4): 465 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
A. E. Geers, J. S. Moog, J. Biedenstein, C. Brenner, and H. Hayes
Spoken Language Scores of Children Using Cochlear Implants Compared to Hearing Age-Mates at School Entry
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2009; 14(3): 371 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. R Moore, L. F Halliday, and S. Amitay
Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2009; 364(1515): 409 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Tan, S. Widjaja, J. Xu, and R. K. Shepherd
Cochlear Implants Stimulate Activity-Dependent CREB Pathway in the Deaf Auditory Cortex: Implications for Molecular Plasticity Induced by Neural Prosthetic Devices
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1799 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
B. Figueras, L. Edwards, and D. Langdon
Executive Function and Language in Deaf Children
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2008; 13(3): 362 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. N. Plyler, J. Bahng, and D. von Hapsburg
The Acceptance of Background Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 502 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
D. J. Ertmer, N. M. Young, and S. Nathani
Profiles of Vocal Development in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 393 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
L. S. Eisenberg, K. I. Kirk, A. S. Martinez, E. A. Ying, and R. T. Miyamoto
Communication Abilities of Children With Aided Residual Hearing: Comparison With Cochlear Implant Users
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2004; 130(5): 563 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. McConkey Robbins, D. B. Koch, M. J. Osberger, S. Zimmerman-Phillips, and L. Kishon-Rabin
Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Auditory Skill Development in Infants and Toddlers
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2004; 130(5): 570 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. E. Geers
Speech, Language, and Reading Skills After Early Cochlear Implantation
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2004; 130(5): 634 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Young Exceptional ChildrenHome page
L. H. Nelson and S. S. Johnston
Children With Cochlear Implants: In the Inclusive Early Childhood Classroom
Young Exceptional Children, October 1, 2003; 7(1): 2 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. B. Pulsifer, C. F. Salorio, and J. K. Niparko
Developmental, Audiological, and Speech Perception Functioning in Children After Cochlear Implant Surgery
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2003; 157(6): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Kral, R. Hartmann, J. Tillein, S. Heid, and R. Klinke
Hearing after Congenital Deafness: Central Auditory Plasticity and Sensory Deprivation
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2002; 12(8): 797 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. Syka
Plastic Changes in the Central Auditory System After Hearing Loss, Restoration of Function, and During Learning
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2002; 82(3): 601 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
S. S. Hehar, T. P. Nikolopoulos, K. P. Gibbin, and G. M. O'Donoghue
Surgery and Functional Outcomes in Deaf Children Receiving Cochlear Implants Before Age 2 Years
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2002; 128(1): 11 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Kral, R. Hartmann, J. Tillein, S. Heid, and R. Klinke
Congenital Auditory Deprivation Reduces Synaptic Activity within the Auditory Cortex in a Layer-specific Manner
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2000; 10(7): 714 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. M O'Donoghue
Hearing without ears: do cochlear implants work in children?
BMJ, January 9, 1999; 318(7176): 72 - 73.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.