JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.40 170-182 February 1997.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Jack, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Jack, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparative Assessment of Electroglottographic and Acoustic Measures of Jitter in Pathological Voices

Maurílio N. Vieira 1
Fergus R. McInnes 2

Mervyn A. Jack 2

1 University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, Scotland and Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Brazil
2 University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, Scotland

maurilio{at}ccir.ed.ac.uk

Jitter, or the amount of cycle-to-cycle variation in the fundamental frequency, is a characteristic of the vocal folds' vibration that may affect electroglottographic (EGG) and acoustic signals in similar ways, because the translaryngeal conductance and the oral pressure are modulated by the same physiological mechanism. Despite the apparent simplicity in jitter computation and the relative facility in recording and analyzing EGG signals, only a few studies comparing EGG and acoustic jitter have been reported. This can be attributed to the remarkable sensitivity of measures of acoustic jitter to such features as the type of sound being analyzed, the equipment used for data acquisition, or the algorithms used to identify glottal cycle boundaries. To assess the agreement achievable by measures from these signals in pathological voices, acoustic and EGG waveforms of sustained vowels (/i/, /a/, /u/) produced by 15 dysphonic patients were analyzed by jitter extraction methods on the basis of peaks, zero crossings, and a waveform matching technique. The agreement, expressed as normalized absolute differences between acoustic- and EGG-derived jitter, was poorer for /i/ and /u/ than for /a/ vowels. For /a/ vowels, a method of acoustic jitter estimation is also proposed that combines peaks and zero crossings and resulted in increased consistency with the zero crossing-based EGG measures (mean normalized absolute difference: 10.95%; SD: 6.44%; range: 23.81%). The proposed method, which has a built-in test intended to reject unreliable estimates, may provide more confidence in acoustic measures in dysphonic speakers and lead to a better understanding of the relationships between acoustic and EGG signals.

KEY WORDS: jitter, voice, electroglottography, acoustic, dysphonia

Submitted on January 22, 1996
Accepted on July 30, 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.