JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.39 191-199 February 1996.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCready, V.
Right arrow Articles by Krikorian, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCready, V.
Right arrow Articles by Krikorian, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Conflict Tactics in the Supervisory Process

Vicki McCready 1
Joanne Erwick Roberts 2
Deborah Bengala 3
Holly Harris 4
Georgia Kingsley 5

Carol Krikorian 6

1 Division of Communication Sciences and Disorders University of North Carolina at Greensboro
2 Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders East Carolina University Greenville, NC
4 Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
5 Developmental Evaluation Center Greensboro, NC
6 Guilford County Public Schools Greensboro, NC

This study investigated three different tactics clinical supervisors in communication disorders predicted they would use in a specific conflict situation. One hundred-sixty supervisors were asked to read one of three case scenarios describing a conflict situation within the supervisory process. All scenarios depicted a student-clinician who had not completed a reading assignment requested by the supervisor. The scenarios differed only in the supervisee's response to the supervisor's question about the incomplete assignment. Subjects were asked to indicate how likely they might be to use each of 15 comments that reflected categories of conflict tactics: avoidance, competitive, or collaborative tactics. Supervisors' choice of tactics differed depending on the response of the supervisee. Overall, supervisors most often chose collaborative responses, followed by avoidance responses and (least often) competitive responses. Implications are discussed in terms of impact on the supervisory process in communication disorders.

KEY WORDS: conflict tactics, interpersonal communication, supervisory process, avoidance, competitive, and collaborative tactics

Submitted on April 4, 1994
Accepted on June 5, 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.