JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.38 490-502 April 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubno, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubno, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Confidence Limits for Maximum Word-Recognition Scores

Judy R. Dubno 1
Fu-Shing Lee 1
Alan J. Klein 1
Lois J. Matthews 1

Chan F. Lam 2
1 Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston
2 Department of Biometry and Epidemiology Department of Radiology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston

dubnojr{at}musc.edu

Clinical judgments are often made regarding whether maximum word-recognition scores (PBmax) are appropriate in relation to degree of sensorineural hearing loss. In order to determine if word recognition is significantly poorer than expected, it is necessary to consider the lower boundary of PBmax associated with a particular degree of hearing loss for speech materials commonly used to measure word recognition. The purpose of this experiment was to define a confidence limit for PBmax from Northwestern University Test #6 (NU-6) word-recognition scores obtained from a large group of young and aged subjects with confirmed cochlear hearing loss. Word-recognition scores at several speech levels were obtained from 407 ears with a wide range of pure-tone averages. Because the characteristics of the distribution of maximum scores are not known, a procedure was developed using computer simulations to approximate the distribution of word-recognition scores corresponding to PBmax and determine the 95% confidence limit (CL). Results of the simulation were confirmed by comparing means and standard deviations of PBmax derived from experimental and simulation data. Percentages of young and aged subjects with scores outside the 95% CL are equal to their proportions in the entire subject sample. If PB,, determined from a score-level psychometric function is poorer than the 95% CL, PBmax may be considered "disproportionately" poor in relation to the degree of hearing loss. One score measured at a single arbitrary suprathreshold level that is poorer than the 95% CL suggests that the score may underestimate PBmax and that word recognition should be measured at additional levels to obtain a more reasonable estimate of the listener's maximum word-recognition score.

KEY WORDS: maximum NU#6 word-recognition score, pure-tone average, confidence limits, binomial model, computer simulation

Submitted on June 3, 1994
Accepted on November 9, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.