JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.38 338-350 April 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kehoe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buder, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kehoe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buder, E. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Acoustic Correlates of Stress in Young Children's Speech

Margaret Kehoe 1
Carol Stoel-Gammon 1

Eugene H. Buder 1

1 University of Washington Seattle

csg{at}u.washington.edu

This study examined the acoustic correlates of stress in children's productions of familiar words. Previous research has employed experimental words rather than familiar words to examine children's phonetic marking of stress, or has not adequately controlled for phonetic environment. Subjects in this study included 22 children, aged 18–30 months, and 6 adults. Fundamental frequency, duration, and amplitude measures were extracted from stressed and unstressed syllables in two types of comparisons: one that controlled phonetic environment and syllable position (interword) and one that measured the relative effects of stress within the same word (intraword). When the tokens were analyzed on the basis of target stress pattern, results revealed no differences between adults and children in their acoustic marking of stress. Listener judgments showed that approximately 30% of children's two-syllable productions were coded unreliably or were perceived as inaccurately stressed. Overall findings indicate that children control fundamental frequency, amplitude, and duration to derive perceptually identifiable stress contrasts in the majority of their productions but they are not completely adult-like in their marking of stress.

KEY WORDS: phonological acquisition, word stress, acoustic correlates

Submitted on June 20, 1994
Accepted on November 3, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
M. Dohen and H. L{oelig}venbruck
Interaction of audition and vision for the perception of prosodic contrastive focus.
Language and Speech, January 1, 2009; 52(Pt 2-3): 177 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.