JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.38 273-279 April 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cornell, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cornell, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Acoustic Prediction of Severity in Commonly Occurring Voice Problems

Virginia Wolfe 1
James Fitch 2

Richard Cornell 1
1 Auburn University at Montgomery Montgomery, AL
2 Auburn University Auburn, AL

The relative effectiveness of three acoustic measures (jitter, shimmer, and harmonic/noise ratio) in predicting the dysphonic severity of a diverse clinical population singly and together was investigated. Phonatory samples were recorded from 20 normal subjects and 60 patients representing 3 laryngeal groups (nodules, paralysis, and functional). The phonatory samples were evaluated by 22 listeners using a 7-point equal-appearing interval scale. Shimmer produced a bivariate correlation of 0.54 with dysphonic severity; harmonic/noise ratio correlated –0.32 with dysphonic severity; and jitter produced no significant correlation with severity. The combination of acoustic variables through multiple regression analysis produced a correlation of 0.56, with only shimmer and average F0 contributing to the correlation. For this particular clinical population, therefore, findings indicated that (a) none of the variables was strongly correlated with dysphonia ratings, and (b) a combination of acoustic predictors was no more successful than a single predictor of dysphonic severity, namely, shimmer.

KEY WORDS: acoustic, voice, dysphonia, jitter, shimmer

Submitted on December 6, 1993
Accepted on August 30, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.