JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.37 687-699 June 1994.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dagenais, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by McCutcheon, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dagenais, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by McCutcheon, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparing Abilities of Children With Profound Hearing Impairments to Learn Consonants Using Electropalatography or Traditional Aural.Oral Techniques

Paul A. Dagenais 1
Paula Critz-Crosby 2
Samuel G. Fletcher 2

Martin J. McCutcheon 2

1 University of South Alabama Mobile
2 University of Alabama at Birmingham

Two groups of nine children with profound hearing impairments and low intelligibility were taught to produce the consonants /t,d,k,g,s,zint/ using either electropalatographic (palatometry) or traditional aural-oral techniques. Testing was completed pre-, immediately post-, and 6 months post-treatment by examining productions of CV syllables (V=/i,a/) using electropalatography-determined linguapalatal contacts and listener identifications. Intelligibility was also measured using the CID Picture Speech Intelligibility Evaluation (SPINE) test. Both groups improved their consonant productions as a result of 26 50-minute sessions. Sessions were given twice daily over 3- to 4-week training periods. Immediately post-treatment, the electropalatography-trained subjects produced better consonants as measured by linguapalatal contact patterns and listener identifications. The linguapalatal-contact patterns learned by the electropalatography-trained group better matched normal speaker productions than did those of the traditionally trained group. Both groups showed equal improvement for both post-treatment conditions when tested with the CID SPINE test. Although further research is needed, the results of this study suggest that electropalatographic techniques are, at least, equal alternatives to traditional aural-oral speech training techniques for speakers with profound hearing impairments.

KEY WORDS: hearing Impairment, speech training, electropalatography, palatometry

Submitted on February 17, 1993
Accepted on January 4, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.