Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.37 205-215 February 1994.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Editors' Awards
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychometric Functions for Children's Detection of Tones in Noise

Prudence Allen 1
Frederic Wightman 1
1 Waisman Center for Mental Retardation and Human Development University of Wisconsin Madison

This article reports the results of an experiment that used a two-alternative forced-choice task to measure the ability of 3- to 5-year-old children to detect 501 Hz, 1000 Hz, and 2818 Hz sinusoids in noise. Psychometric functions were fit to each individual's data, and thresholds (signal level required for 75% correct) were interpolated from the fitted functions. Results showed that, on average, the children's thresholds were higher and the slopes of their psychometric functions were shallower than those of the adults. However, the between-subjects variability in the children's data was large, and the performance of many individual children was not well described by group mean performance. One-third of the children produced thresholds that were elevated by an average of 10 dB but psychometric function slopes that were adult-like. Another one-third of the children produced thresholds that were elevated relative to those of the adults by an average of 20 dB and psychometric function slopes that were very shallow. The data from a smaller group of children showed large variability in psychometric function slope and threshold, and for a very few children performance was at chance regardless of the signal level. A replication of the study several months later showed that for most listeners the individual patterns of performance persisted over time.

KEY WORDS: audition, detection, development, psychometric functions, hearing

Submitted on January 25, 1993
Accepted on September 16, 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
A. E. Carney
Auditory System Development and Dysfunction: What Do We Really Know about Childhood Hearing Loss?
Trends in Amplification, June 1, 1999; 4(2): 32 - 38.
[PDF]

Home page
 TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
D. E. Lewis
Selecting and Pre-Setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?
Trends in Amplification, June 1, 1999; 4(2): 72 - 89.
[PDF]