JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.36 1097-1102 October 1993.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, G. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, G. K.

The Influence of Noise on the Measured Amplitudes of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions

M. L. Whitehead 1
B. L. Lonsbury-Martin 1

G. K. Martin 1

1 University of Miami Ear Institute Miami, FL

mwhite{at}newssun.med.miami.edu

This paper describes the influence of noise on the measured amplitudes of tonal signals, as determined using narrowband spectral analysis, that is, the technique typically used to measure distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). At small signal-to-noise ratios, background noise results in overestimation of DPOAE amplitude and, thus, substantially influences the measured properties of the low-level portions of DPOAE-growth functions, in particular the apparent slope of the functions in this region. It is shown that, because of the influence of noise, the algorithm for the objective estimation of detection thresholds of DPOAEs, and of the slopes of DPOAE-growth functions, described by Nelson and Kimberley (1992), will tend to underestimate these values. This systematic underestimation is presumably the reason why many of the DPOAE-detection thresholds and growth slopes presented in that study were considerably lower than those reported in previous studies using similar measuring equipment and paradigms but different detection-threshold and growth-slope estimation techniques. In the present paper, a simple equation allowing an estimated correction for the effects of noise on measured DPOAE amplitudes is presented. Finally, an alternative strategy for the estimation of DPOAE thresholds, one that is less prone to the influence of noise, is suggested.

KEY WORDS: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, noise, signal-to-noise ratio, detection threshold

Submitted on November 30, 1992
Accepted on May 4, 1993







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.