JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.35 1160-1168 October 1992.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hnath-Chisolm, T.
Right arrow Articles by Boothroyd, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hnath-Chisolm, T.
Right arrow Articles by Boothroyd, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Speechreading Enhancement by Voice Fundamental Frequency

The Effects of Fo Contour Distortions

Theresa Hnath-Chisolm 1
Arthur Boothroyd 2

1 University of South Florida Tampa
2 Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY

Recognition of words in sentences of known topic was measured in normally hearing adults via speechreading alone and speechreading supplemented with auditory presentation of signals intended to convey variations of voice fundamental frequency (Fo) over time. Three signals were used: (a) the low-pass filtered output of an electroglottograph (unprocessed Fo), (b) a constant amplitude sine wave whose instantaneous frequency was intended to equal that of Fo (processed Fo), and (c) the same sine wave restricted to a small number of discrete frequency steps (quantized Fo). As the number of steps in the quantized Fo contours increased from 1 to 12, the speechreading enhancement effect increased. The quantized Fo contour with 12 steps was as effective as the processed Fo contour (without quantization), but this processed contour was significantly less effective than the unprocessed electroglottograph signal. The results show that the auditory Fo speechreading enhancement effect is sensitive to the errors introduced by the Fo extraction and regeneration process used in this study. It is also sensitive to the quantization of Fo contours into less than 12 steps. Whether more than 12 steps are required for the full enhancement effect remains to be determined.

KEY WORDS: speechreading, voice fundamental frequency, distortions, auditory enhancement

Submitted on August 26, 1991
Accepted on January 24, 1992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.