JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.35 708-717 June 1992.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tye-Murray, N.
Right arrow Articles by Woodworth, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tye-Murray, N.
Right arrow Articles by Woodworth, G. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reported Use of Communication Strategies by SHHH Members

Client, Talker, and Situational Variables

Nancy Tye-Murray 1
Suzanne C. Purdy 2

George G. Woodworth 3

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa, Iowa City
2 Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Speech Pathology and Audiology University of Iowa, Iowa City
3 Department of Statistics University of Iowa, Iowa City

Two hundred and twelve members of the Self Help for Hard of Hearing People (SHHH) organization completed a survey that evaluated their use of communication strategies Reported use of strategies was correlated with attitudinal variables and social-interaction indices. On average, subjects agreed most strongly with questionnaire items stating they would ask a talker to repeat a misperceived utterance. They agreed less strongly with items stating they would ask the talker to restructure or elaborate an utterance. Subjects agreed strongly that they would use the communication strategies with familiar talkers, and less strongly that they would use them with unfamiliar talkers. Subjects who appeared less likely to say nothing after misperceiving an utterance were more likely to disagree that they were frustrated with their speechreading skills, and they appeared less likely to avoid social Interactions. Subjects who ndicated a greater likelihood of using anticipatory strategies, such as reviewing potential vocabulary before an appointment, were on average more likely to avoid social interactions. They also agreed more strongly that poor speechreaders appear less intelligent

KEY WORDS: communication strategies, repair strategies, speechreading, aural rehabilitation, communication therapy

Submitted on January 11, 1991
Accepted on August 13, 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.