JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.35 222-233 February 1992.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Spectral Pattern Discrimination by Children

Prudence Allen 1
Frederic Wightman 1

1 Waisman Center for Mental Retardation and Human Development University of Wisconsin, Madison

This research measured the ability of 47 children, aged 4–9 years, to use spectral shape cues to discriminate among random-intensity sounds. The children were tested in forced-choice paradigms that were embedded in a video game format. Two classes of sounds were studied: tonal complexes with sinusoidally rippled amplitude spectra, and synthetic speech sounds (isolated vowels and consonants). The discriminability of the sounds was measured both in quiet and in a background of wide-band noise. Although the intersubject variability in performance was high, especially among the youngest children, the results revealed a substantial age effect. For both classes of sounds, the performance of the younger children was significantly poorer than the performance of an adult control group. However, there was no evidence in the data that the masking effect of the noise was greater for the children than for the adults.

KEY WORDS: hearing, children, discrimination, development, noise

Submitted on January 18, 1991
Accepted on June 24, 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.