|
|
||||||||
Three types of commercially available caloric irrigation unitsair, water, and closed-loopwere evaluated for nystagmus response patterns and comfort. Electronystagmographic recordings were analyzed for slow-phase velocity, response duration, amplitude, frequency, and test-retest reliability. Significant differences were found among the three types of irrigators, between warm and cool irrigators, and between male and female subjects. Test-retest reliability was adequate for all three units. Subjects clearly favored the closed-loop system over the water and air irrigators, but the water irrigator yielded the most robust caloric response.
KEY WORDS: caloric Irrigation, closed-loop caloric Irrigators, air caloric Irrigators, water caloric Irrigators
Submitted on July 13, 1990
Accepted on April 18, 1991
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |