JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.34 1371-1386 December 1991.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freyman, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freyman, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Frequency Discrimination as a Function of Signal Frequency and Level in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Richard L. Freyman 1
David A. Nelson 1

1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Frequency difference limens (DLFs) for pure tones were obtained over a wide range of frequencies and levels from 7 normal-hearing subjects and 16 ears of 12 listeners with sensorineural hearing losses. The normal data were fitted with a general prediction equation. Variability of the data around the DLFs estimated by the equation was quantified and used to evaluate the DLFs from the hearing-impaired listeners. The majority of DLFs from impaired listeners were poorer than one standard deviation above the estimates of the normal equation at all frequencies and sensation levels (SLs). The portion of the equation concerned with sensation level was fitted to each listener's data at each frequency. The slopes of these functions indicated that, on average, the rate of improvement of the DLF with sensation level was similar in the two groups of subjects. These results suggest that it would be reasonable to compare DLFs from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners at equivalent sensation levels. The intercepts of the DLF-intensity functions represent asymptotic values obtained at high SLs. These asymptotic DLFs were abnormal in the majority of hearing-impaired subjects, with more than half the data in excess of two standard deviations above normal. However, among those subjects, the correlation between the DLF deficit and the amount of hearing loss at the test frequency was not strong (r=+.27).

KEY WORDS: frequency discrimination, hearing loss, psychoacoustics

Submitted on August 27, 1990
Accepted on February 28, 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.