JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.34 1207-1215 October 1991.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunnarson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Finitzo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunnarson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Finitzo, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conductive Hearing Loss During Infancy

Effects on Later Auditory Brain Stem Electrophysiology

Adele D. Gunnarson 1
Terese Finitzo 2

1 Lamar University Beaumont, TX
2 The Neuroscience Research Center Dallas, TX, and Callier Center/University of Texas at Dallas

Long-term effects on auditory electrophysiology from early fluctuating hearing loss were studied in 27 children, aged 5 to 7 years, who had been evaluated originally in infancy. For controls (Group A), infant auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) were normal from birth to age 2 years. A second group (Group B) had intermittent conductive hearing loss. A third group (Group C) had more abnormal ABRs during infancy than Group B and more severe and frequent conductive hearing loss. For this follow-up study, all children had normal peripheral hearing at test. ABRs were obtained to monaural and binaural stimuli. Binaural interaction (BI) in the ABR was assessed in difference traces, derived by subtracting summed binaural from summed monaural waveforms.

Controls differed from both groups with early hearing loss for wave III and wave V latencies and interpeak I–III and I–V latencies. There was a significant difference in the presence of BI. Eight of 9 A subjects and 8 of 9 B subjects, but only 4 of 9 C subjects, had demonstrable BI. Findings suggest that early fluctuating hearing loss disrupts later auditory brain stem electrophysiology.

KEY WORDS: electrophysiology, auditory deprivation, conductive hearing loss, auditory brain stem response, critical periods

Submitted on July 19, 1989
Accepted on November 1, 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.