JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.34 1017-1022 October 1991.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansell, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ansell, B. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Slow-to-Recover Brain-Injured Patients

Rationale for Treatment

Barbara J. Ansell 1
1 University of Wisconsin Oshkosh

Approximately 10–20% of head injury survivors sustain extensive neurological damage and remain minimally or inconsistently responsive to stimuli for 3–6 months postinjury. These patients, designated as slow to recover (STR), may be candidates for sensory stimulation programs rather than traditional rehabilitation. Medical and insurance personnel have resisted referral and payment for treatment because of the lack of objective measures of progress, a theoretical basis for treatment, and evidence of treatment efficacy. A valid, reliable assessment tool has recently been developed (Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile) that assesses low-level cognitive/communicative function and documents improvement in STR patients. This article addresses the theoretical rationale for treatment. Evidence from four areas—sensory deprivation, enriched environments, nervous system plasticity, and sensitive periods of neurodevelopment— suggests that sensory stimulation programs are potentially beneficial for STR patients. Speech-language pathologists are encouraged to study the recovery patterns of STR patients and to determine the efficacy of treatment strategies.

KEY WORDS: coma, sensory deprivation, cognitive rehabilitation, brain injury

Submitted on June 18, 1990
Accepted on January 22, 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.