JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.34 473-482 June 1991.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Roark, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Roark, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Laryngeal Electromyographic Activity in Adductor and Abductor Spasmodic Dysphonia

Ben C. Watson 1
Steven D. Schaefer 2
Frances J. Freeman 1
James Dembowski 1
George Kondraske 3

Rick Roark 2

1 The University of Texas at Dallas/Callier Center
2 The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
3 The University of Texas at Arlington

Vocal symptoms in spasmodic dysphonia (SD) range from strain-strangle phonation and glottal-stop phonatory breaks of adductor SD to breathy phonation and aspirate phonatory breaks of abductor SD. Many SD subjects show both symptom types. Heterogeneity in vocal symptoms contributes to controversy surrounding the etiology(s) of SD. Acoustic/perceptual analyses of vocal symptoms are inconclusive in resolving this controversy. This investigation moves the search for distinguishing features of adductor and abductor SD to the level of neuromuscular control and analysis of intrinsic laryngeal muscle (adductor and abductor) activity. Subjects rated perceptually as primarily adductor or abductor SD sustained production of vegetative gestures and isolated speech sounds (/i/ and /s/). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of electromyographic signals recorded from thyroarytenoid (TA) failed to differentiate SD subjects by symptom type. Analysis of TA and posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) activity in one abductor SD revealed high levels in both muscles during production of the voiced vowel. Data suggest that a possible explanation for symptom heterogeneity in SD is the relation between disrupted neuromotor input to laryngeal muscles and reflexive or conscious compensations constrained by laryngeal biomechanics.

KEY WORDS: spasmodic dysphonia, laryngeal electromyography, quantitative EMG

Submitted on March 9, 1990
Accepted on August 17, 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.