JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.34 11-18 February 1991.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalston, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dalston, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalston, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dalston, E. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Preliminary Investigation Concerning the Use of Nasometry in Identifying Patients With Hyponasality and/or Nasal Airway Impairment

Rodger M. Dalston 1
Donald W. Warren 1

Eileen T. Dalston 1

1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

A series of 76 patients referred for evaluation at the Oral-Facial and Communicative Disorders Program was studied in an attempt to determine the extent to which acoustic assessments of speech, made utilizing a Kay Elemetrics Nasometer, corresponded with clinical judgments of hyponasality and aerodynamic measurements of nasal cross-sectional area. Among the 38 adults, the sensitivity of Nasometer ratings in correctly identifying adult subjects with moderate to severe nasal airway impairment was 0.38, whereas the specificity was 0.92. Comparable analyses for the group of 38 children were not possible because of the extent to which nasal airway size varies up to the age of 15 years. Among the entire group of patients, the sensitivity and specificity of nasometry in correctly identifying the presence or absence of hyponasality was 0.48 and 0.79, respectively. However, when patients with audible nasal emission were eliminated from analysis, the sensitivity rose to 1.0 and the specificity rose to 0.85. Possible reasons for the findings obtained and their clinical significance are discussed.

KEY WORDS: hyponasality, nasal airway impairment, acoustic analysis, cleft palate

Submitted on August 2, 1989
Accepted on March 26, 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.