JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.32 161-174 March 1989.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, W. C.

Laryngeal Configuration and Constriction during Two Types of Whispering

Nancy Pearl Solomon 1
Gerald N. McCall 2
Michael W. Trosset 1

William C. Gray 3

1 University of Arizona
2 University of Maryland
3 University of Maryland School of Medicine

Laryngeal functioning during the production of whispered speech is not well understood. The efficacy of whispering as a means of voice rest is a common clinical concern that is unresolved. This investigation examined vocal-fold configuration, glottal size, and airway constriction by supraglottal structures during whispering. Ten normally speaking adults produced consonant-vowel syllables with three different vowels while whispering in low-effort and high-effort manners. The larynx was visualized through fiberoptic endonasolaryngoscopy, and the views were recorded on videotape. Analysis and descriptions of the data revealed that low-effort and high-effort whispering were differentiated to a small extent by vocal-fold adjustments and to a somewhat larger degree by supraglottal constriction. However, for each dependent variable, individual subject differences tended to be considerably larger than any systematic effects due to whisper type or vowel.

Submitted on September 30, 1987
Accepted on July 1, 1988







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.