JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.31 616-619 December 1988.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zizz, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Glattke, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zizz, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Glattke, T. J.

Reliability of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emission Suppression Tuning Curve Measures

Carol A. Zizz 1
Theodore J. Glattke 2

1 Veterans Administration Medical Center Long Beach, CA
2 University of Arizona, Tucson

The purpose of this investigation was to study the reliability of spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) suppression tuning curve (STC) measurements. Two repetitions of an SOAE STC, using a 4-dB suppression criterion, were obtained from 5 subjects who exhibited stable SOAE level (SD les 1.5 dB) and SOAE frequency (±5 Hz). Analyses of variance revealed no significant difference between the SOAE STC trials (p > .05). The SOAE frequency was below the SOAE STC tip, which is similar to the relationship between the probe frequency and a simultaneously masked psychophysical tuning curve. The mean slope of the SOAE STC low-frequency segment was 53.7 dB/octave, whereas the mean slope of the SOAE STC high-frequency segment was 124.8 dB/octave. The mean low- to high-frequency slope ratio was 2.4. The mean Q10 value for the 5 subjects was 5.3. The SOAE STC low- and high-frequency slopes and Q10 were similar to psychophysical tuning curve data obtained in simultaneous masking and physiological tuning curve data.

Submitted on June 22, 1987
Accepted on March 8, 1988







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.