JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.31 265-271 June 1988.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jolley, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jolley, R. G.

Use of Adaptive Digital Signal Processing to Improve Speech Communication for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Subjects

Richard W. Harris 1
Robert H. Brey 1
Martin S. Robinette 2
Douglas M. Chabries 1
Richard W. Christiansen 1

Ray G. Jolley 1

1 Brigham Young University
2 Mayo Clinic

A two microphone adaptive digital noise cancellation technique was used to improve word-recognition ability of normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects in the presence of varying amounts of multitalker speech babble noise and speech spectrum noise. Signal-to-noise ratios varied from -8 dB to + 12 dB in 4 dB increments. The adaptive noise cancellation technique resulted in reducing both the speech babble and speech spectrum noises 18 to 22 dB. This reduction in noise resulted in average improvements in word recognition, at the poorest signal-to-noise ratios, ranging from 37% to 50% for the normally hearing subjects and 27% to 40% for the hearing-impaired subjects. Improvements in word recognition in the presence of speech babble noise as a result of adaptive filtering were just as large or larger than improvements found in the presence of speech spectrum noise. The amount of improvement of word-recognition scores was most pronounced at the least favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Submitted on April 20, 1987
Accepted on October 5, 1987




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
C. Schweitzer
Development of Digital Hearing Aids
Trends in Amplification, June 1, 1997; 2(2): 41 - 77.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.