JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.29 240-255 June 1986.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Revoile, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Revoile, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Speech Cue Enhancement for the Hearing Impaired

I. Altered Vowel Durations for Perception of Final Fricative Voicing

Sally G. Revoile 1
Lisa Holden-Pitt 1
James M. Pickett 1

Fred Brandt 1

1 Gallaudet College, Washington, DC

Hearing-impaired persons with reduced voicing perception for final fricatives were studied for improvement in perception via training or enhancement of the vowel duration cue. Ten utterances each of the syllables/bæf, bæs, bæv, bæz/composed three stimulus sets that were graded for the magnitude of the vowel duration cue. These sets were used differentially among 25 hearing-impaired listeners to train and test voicing perception. When enhanced, the vowels of the utterances were lengthened before voiced fricatives and shortened before voiceless fricatives. Training for the utterances with unmodified vowels yielded a small performance improvement for a subgroup of 14 listeners. In comparison, this subgroup showed considerably more improvement for the utterances with vowel duration enhancements. Another subgroup of 5 listeners displayed good fricative voicing perception independent of training or the vowel duration enhancements. A remaining subgroup of 6 listeners manifested poor use of the maximum unmodified vowel duration cues, even subsequent to training. This group showed a significant improvement in perception only for the voiced fricatives when extra duration enhancement and further training were used. This subgroup also demonstrated the poorest performance for a measure of vowel duration discrimination. Among the auditory variables examined, the listeners' tone thresholds at 250 Hz showed the highest relation to perception of fricative voicing.

Submitted on March 25, 1985
Accepted on January 30, 1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.