JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.27 378-386 September 1984.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Word Recognition with Segmented-Alternated CVC Words

A Preliminary Report on Listeners with Normal Hearing

Richard H. Wilson 1
John T. Arcos 1

Howard C. Jones 1

1 VA Medical Center, Long Beach, California and University of California, Irvine

Consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) monosyllabic words were segmented at the approximate phoneme boundaries and were presented to subjects with normal hearing in the following sequence: (a) the carrier phrase to both ears, (b) the initial consonant segment to one ear, (c) the vowel segment to the other ear, and (d) the final consonant segment to the ear that received the initial consonant. A computer technique, which is described in detail, was used to develop the test materials. The digital editing did not alter appreciably the spectral or temporal characteristics of the words. A series of four experiments produced a list of 50 words on which 10% correct word recognition was achieved by listeners with normal hearing when the vowel segment or the consonant segments of the words were presented monaurally in isolation. When the speech materials were presented binaurally—that is, the vowel segment in one ear and consonant segments in the other ear—word-recognition performance improved to 90% correct.

Submitted on October 24, 1983
Accepted on April 25, 1984


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.