JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.27 76-88 March 1984.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniloff, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vergara, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daniloff, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vergara, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison between the Motoric Constraints for Amer-Ind and ASL Sign Formation

Joanne Kelsch Daniloff 1
Deborah Vergara 1

1 University of Vermont, Burlington

Previous research has shown that Amer-Ind signals are more easily learned and remembered than their synonyms in American Sign Language. One possible reason is a difference in motoric complexity between the two systems. To test the hypothesis that such a difference exists, the positions and movements that constitute the 236 signals of Amer-Ind Code were compared with those of their synonyms in American Sign Language. It was found that the ASL signs were indeed more complex in terms of changes of hand orientation during production, the use of two hands rather than one, the number of different handshapes used, and the total amount of movement required. When the two systems were compared in terms of the normal development of finger, hand, and arm movements, it was found that more Amer-Ind signals than ASL signs are within the competence of infants at both the 6-month and 12-month levels. Relative to the motor coordination required to execute both systems, it was concluded that the Amer-Ind corpus is less complex than a matched group of ASL signs.

Submitted on October 19, 1982
Accepted on April 29, 1983


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.