JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.27 56-62 March 1984.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kennard, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kennard, K. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lombard and Sidetone Amplification Effects in Normal and Misarticulating Children

Gerald M. Siegel 1
Karen L. Kennard 1

1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Misarticulating and normal-speaking children participated in Lombard and sidetone amplification procedures, under standard instructions and under instructions designed to maximize the response to the procedures. The experimental group consisted of twelve 8-year-old children who misarticulated the /r/ sound. They were matched with normal-speaking school peers. In the Lombard procedure, the children told stories about familiar pictures under 60 dB SPL and 90 dB SPL of masking noise. In the sidetone amplification procedure, they performed the same task under 0 and +20 dB of amplified feedback. The dependent measure was vocal intensity. Both groups increased intensity under the noise and decreased under amplification. The instructions enhanced the effects for both groups, but more for the normals than for the misarticulating children in the case of the sidetone amplification procedure. In general, the procedures were effective with both groups, and there was no evidence that misarticulating children suffer from a generalized deficit in feedback processing.

Submitted on January 3, 1983
Accepted on June 24, 1983


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.