JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.25 339-347 September 1982.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Auditory Processing of Vowels by Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Sid P. Bacon 1
John F. Brandt 1

1 University of Kansas, Lawrence

"Masking" patterns were obtained in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using the pulsation-threshold procedure. Synthesized vowel maskers/a/and/æ/were presented at various sound pressure levels and alternated with a sinusoidal probe of a given frequency at a repetition rate of 4 Hz, T = 250 msec. Simultaneous-masking patterns also were obtained in one normal-hearing listener. The vowel pulsation patterns (VPPs) for the normal-hearing listeners closely resembled the acoustic spectra of the vowel maskers. Neither the pulsation patterns for the hearing-impaired listeners nor the simultaneous-masking patterns for the normal-hearing listener preserved the contour of the vowel spectra. These results are interpreted in terms of suppression effects, which have been observed only with nonsimultaneous-masking paradigms in normal-hearing listeners and have not been observed in listeners with a cochlear hearing loss. The effects of increased masker level were the same for both groups of listeners and are discussed in terms of upward spread of masking and a masking function with a slope less than 1.0.

Submitted on August 7, 1980
Accepted on May 11, 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.