JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.25 333-338 September 1982.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stemple, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stemple, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessment of Three Modes of Alaryngeal Speech with a Synthetic Sentence Identification (SSI) Task in Varying Message-to-Competition Ratios

John Greer Clark 1
Joseph C. Stemple 2
1 Cincinnati Center for Improved Communication, Cincinnati, Ohio
2 St. Elizabeth Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio

The intelligibility measures and listener preference rankings of pulmonary esophageal speech following tracheo-esophageal puneture (TEP) surgery were assessed relative to traditional esophageal speech, artificial laryngeal speech, and normal laryngeal speech. Intelligibility rankings were obtained with sentence length stimuli in the presence of a background competing message at varying message-to-competition ratios. Results for 20 normal-hearing adult subjects showed that although pulmonary esophageal speech was the most preferred of the alaryngeal speech modes, it was the least intelligible in the two most difficult listening conditions (-5-dB and -10-dB message-to-competition ratios).

Submitted on December 24, 1980
Accepted on May 11, 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.