JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.25 322-333 September 1982.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, C.
Right arrow Articles by Till, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, C.
Right arrow Articles by Till, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Morphophonemic Rule Learning in Normal and Articulation-Disordered Children

Carla Dunn 1
James A. Till 2

1 University of Texas at Austin
2 University of Washington, Seattle

This study investigated the phonological learning abilities of articulation-disordered children. Eight normally speaking and eight articulation-disordered kindergarten children were taught an artificial morphophonemic rule. The rule required the subjects to extract and organize phonological information by differentiating among the critical features of stop and fricative consonants. A miniature artificial language paradigm was used to teach the rule by auditorily presenting a limited number of examples of the rule and measuring generalization to untaught items. The groups were compared to determine if they differed in rate or accuracy of learning and generalization of the correct response. Individual patterns of learning were also examined. Results revealed essentially no differences in the way the two groups learned the stop class. In contrast, the disordered children incorporated fricatives into the rule more quickly than the normal children did. In addition, there was a trend for the disordered children to respond with more accuracy and more generalized responses to the fricatives. This trend was unexpected and is discussed in terms of a sensitive period for learning phonological information.

Submitted on December 24, 1980
Accepted on May 11, 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.