JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.25 224-229 June 1982.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwan, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwan, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Feedback on Referential Communication of Preschool Children

Susan J. Iwan 1
Gerald M. Siegel 1

1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Preschool children were paired in 12 speaker-listener dyads in which the speaker described common, familiar items and the listener attempted to guess their identity. Objects were presented until the listener had successfully guessed five objects and had missed five objects. Suecessfully guessed objects were conspicuously placed in an E-Z box whereas those missed were conspicuously placed in a HARD box. These 10 objects were then presented to the same team for identification once again, with each object being removed from the E-Z or HARD box with appropriate comments about its difficulty offered by the experimenter. Postfeedback, the speakers used longer and more informative descriptions for items that had originally been failed, and shorter, less informative descriptions for those that had been successfully guessed on the first identification trials. The changes in the form of the messages for the success items were somewhat greater than for the failure items, suggesting that children might not have mastered specific strategies for composing maximally useful messages, even when the children were disposed to respond to listener communicative needs.

Submitted on January 2, 1980
Accepted on March 2, 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.