JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.23 162-184 March 1980.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walden, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walden, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Consonant Similarity Judgments by Normal and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Brian E. Walden 1
Allen A. Montgomery 1
Robert A. Prosek 1

Daniel M. Schwartz 1

1 Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

This investigation attempted to identify listener strategies or perceptual modes that might be adopted by hearing-impaired listeners when making similarity judgments among pairs of speech sounds. Further, an attempt was made to describe the relationship between similarity judgments and auditory confusions for such listeners. Subjects provided similarity ratings and recognition responses to consonant pairs. The resulting similarity judgments were organized into a variety of similarity matrices and analyzed via multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, as well as by traditional descriptive and interpretative statistics. The analyses of the similarity ratings between consonants showed that hearing-impaired listeners apply phonemic labels to the stimuli and base their ratings on these labels rather than on the unlabeled acoustic characteristics of the speech sounds. Analysis of the recognition data indicated that those consonants which are most confused are not necessarily the most conceptually similar to the listener.

Submitted on June 2, 1978
Accepted on April 10, 1979


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.