JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.20 81-94 March 1977.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. V.

Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Intensity on the Middle Components of the Averaged Auditory Electroencephalic Response

Aaron R. Thornton
Maurice I. Mendel
Charles V. Anderson

University of Iowa, Iowa City

Middle components (la6tency 8–50 msec) of the averaged auditory electroencephalic response (AAER), evoked by brief duration tone bursts, were recorded from 11 normal-hearing subjects. Latency and amplitude measurements were made on five peaks (Na, Pa, Nb, Pb, and Nc) of the AAER waveforms recorded for 27 experimental conditions: three conditions of stimulus frequency (250, 1000, and 4000 Hz) at each of nine conditions of signal intensity (a no-stimulus control and 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 dB re: group thresholds). Latency for each peak decreased with increased stimulus frequency, and it tended to decrease slightly with increases in stimulus intensity. Amplitude input-output characteristics varied with stimulus frequency and response peak. In general, the most linear input-output characteristics occurred for the early peaks and high stimulus frequencies. Characteristics for later peaks and lower frequencies tended to asymptote at moderate stimulus intensities. Between-subject variability was not much greater than within-subject variability for the single event auditory evoked potential (AEP). The variance of the AEP, however, was nearly as great (as much as two-thirds) as the variance of the background EEG, despite the large difference between AEP and background EEG amplitude.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.