JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.18 541-553 September 1975.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zlatin, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koenigsknecht, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zlatin, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koenigsknecht, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development of the Voicing Contrast: Perception of Stop Consonants

Marsha A. Zlatin
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Roy A. Koenigsknecht
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

Perceptual development of the voicing contrast was investigated in two-year-old children, six-year-old children, and adults. Subjects were required to identify pre-vocalic stop consonants from synthetic speech stimuli-bees/peas, bear/pear, dime/time, and goat/coat. The stimuli differed with respect to the acoustic cue, voice onset time (VOT). Identification functions for labial, apical, and velar stops were plotted for each subject. Measurements of 50% crossover, lower and upper limits of the phoneme boundary, and phoneme boundary width were obtained from the identification functions. Significant age-dependent differences in perception of the voicing contrast were observed. The results were interpreted as indicating that the magnitude of VOT difference required for distinguishing between prevocalic stop cognates decreases as a function of the age of the listeners.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
M. P. Lynch, R. E. Eilers, and M. H. Bornstein
Speech, Vision, and Music Perception: Windows on the Ontogeny of Mind
Psychology of Music, April 1, 1992; 20(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.