JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.17 669-681 December 1974.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sher, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sher, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Consonant Confusions Associated with Hearing Loss above 2000 Hz

Annabelle E. Sher
Elmer Owens

University of California, Medical Center, San Francisco, California

A 100-item test for the identification of phonemes was presented to two groups of listeners. One group consisted of 35 patients with normal hearing up to 2000 Hz accompanied by a high-tone loss. The other group consisted of persons with normal hearing who heard the speech stimuli presented through a low-pass filter with a cutoff at 2040 Hz. There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall scores, in probabilities of error for individual phonemes, or in the kinds of error substitutions made. Findings were as follows: (1) the overall scores indicated difficulty in phonemic identification; (2) the phonemes contributing to this difficulty were primarily /b, p, t, k, s, {theta}/ in both the initial and final positions, /t{int}, {int}, f, d{Ezh}, z, v/ in the final position only, and /d/ in the initial position only; and (3) the phonemes substituted for the stimulus phonemes in the initial position were the same in manner of articulation as the stimulus phoneme, and typically only one confusion occurred per stimulus phoneme. The phonemes substituted for the stimulus phonemes in the final position were not necessarily the same in manner of articulation as the stimulus phoneme, and more than one confusion generally occurred for each stimulus phoneme.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.