JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.17 470-488 September 1974.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kent, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Severeid, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kent, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Severeid, L. R.

Velar Movement and Timing: Evaluation of a Model for Binary Control

Raymond D. Kent
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

Patrick J. Carney
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee

Larry R. Severeid
Gundersen Clinic, Ltd., La Crosse, Wisconsin

Cinefluorographic analyses of the articulatory movements of two speakers were used to evaluate a binary model of velar control. To obtain precise timing data for movements of the tongue and velum, radiopaque markers were attached to these structures and then tracked by cinefluorography. It is argued that the binary control model does not survive rigorous empirical test because (1) it makes some predictions that are inappropriate for American English, and (2) the confirmation criteria used in previous reports were applied inconsistently. We suggest that if binary control models are to be used in making predictions about the timing of articulations, then the binary feature values should be interpreted by means of a systematic phonetics or an elaborated speech production model. We further suggest that sequences of articulatory movements may be organized in a hierarchical fashion, such that neuromotor instructions from the motor command system often are issued simultaneously for the tongue, velum, lips, and jaw, even though the commands may not always apply to the same phonetic segment.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.