JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.15 518-528 September 1972.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winitz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bellerose, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winitz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bellerose, B.

Phonetic Interference and Motor Recall

Harris Winitz
Betty Bellerose

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri

Sources of interference external to the laboratory were tested by instructing children to learn non-English clusters or sequences. Control subjects learned comparable English units and sequences. Of three separate experiments where varied sounds and retention intervals were used, in only one instance did experimental subjects show a decrement in memory. The findings, therefore, do not support the hypothesis—given the conditions of the experiments reported in the paper—that extraexperimental associations cause a decrement in memory. Further, the finding that imitation is highly stable over the intervals tested suggests that "motor memory" does not contribute to articulatory decay.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.