JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.15 49-60 March 1972.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruder, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruder, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, P. J.

Fluent and Hesitation Pauses as a Function of Syntactic Complexity

Kenneth F. Ruder
Paul J. Jensen

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

The effect of syntactic complexity on fluent and hesitation pause durations was investigated. The stimuli consisted of five recorded sentences within which the words lost and contact were manipulated so that their syntactic relation to each other varied in complexity from sentence to sentence. Twelve subjects, working individually, mechanically adjusted the silent interval duration between the words lost and contact within each sentence in order to locate (1) the pause detection threshold, (2) optimal fluent pause duration, and (3) minimal hesitation pause duration. Silent interval duration did not differ significantly from one level of syntactic complexity to the next for either pause detection threshold or fluent pause. Hesitation pause duration, however, did differ significantly as a function of syntactic structure, in that hesitation pauses perceived within a subordinate clause boundary were significantly longer in duration than were those occurring in other types of syntactic boundaries. Further, subjects were consistent in their perceptual judgments of speech pauses from one time to the next. Individual subjects, however, showed a considerable degree of variability.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.