JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.15 201-210 March 1972.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeter, I. K.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeter, I. K.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, S.

A Comparison of Phonemic and Graphemic Features of Eight English Consonants in Auditory and Visual Modes

Irma K. Jeter
Sadanand Singh

Howard University, Washington, D.C.

Eight English consonants in CV context were presented graphemically and phonemically in visual and auditory modalities for similarity judgments using the ABX method. An interpretation of two three-dimensional MD-SCAL configurations (Euclidean) of these judgments revealed the graphemic feature categories of form (vertical-rounded, vertical-crossed, and angular), place (labial and alveolar), and manner (stop and continuant), and the phonemic feature categories of place (labial and alveolar), manner (stop and continuant), and voicing. The visual data had lower "stress," hence a better fit, than the auditory data. The graphemic features were the better predictors of the visual mode than the phonemic features were of the auditory mode. Visual data showed higher multiple R (0.809) than the auditory data (0.677) when their MD-SCAL dimensions were correlated with the graphemic and phonemic features respectively. The commonality of the features place and manner in cueing visual and auditory judgments indicated the coding of these features at a higher cortical level than where these modalities are distinguished.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.