JSLHR Papers in Press
Published online January 5, 2012
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2012; doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0273)

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2012;55:421.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text ([PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pesco, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pesco, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Predicting Later Language Outcomes from the Language Use Inventory

Diane Pesco
Concordia University

Daniela K. O'Neill
University of Waterloo

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Diane Pesco, Department of Education (LB 501-3), Concordia University, 1455 boul. de Maisonneuve West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: dpesco{at}education.concordia.ca. Phone 514-848-2424 ext. 7338. Fax 514-848-4520.

Purpose: To examine the predictive validity of the Language Use Inventory (LUI), a parent report of language use by children 18 to 47 months old (O'Neill, 2009).

Method: 348 children whose parents had completed the LUI were re-assessed at 5 to 6 years old with standardized, norm-referenced language measures and parent report of developmental history. The relationship between scores on the LUI and later measures was examined through correlation, binary classification, and ROC curve analysis.

Results: For children aged 24 to 47 months at the time of LUI completion, LUI scores correlated significantly with language measure scores. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was also calculated for four cut-off scores on the LUI, including –1.64 SD, a score that maximized sensitivity to 81% and specificity to 93%. For children aged 18–23 months at the time of LUI completion, specificity and NPV were high but sensitivity and PPV were lower than desirable.

Conclusions: The results provide initial support for the LUI's predictive validity, particularly for children 24–47 months, and suggest the LUI can serve as an indicator of later language outcomes in referred populations. The results compare favourably to findings for other early child language measures.

KEY WORDS: predictive validity, pragmatics, parent report, language assessment, language delay


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?