JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JSLHR Papers in Press
Published online August 20, 2009

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009; doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0024)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text ([PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sivasankar, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sivasankar, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Evidence for Adverse Phonatory Change Following an Inhaled Combination Treatment

Elizabeth Erickson
Mahalakshmi Sivasankar

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Address for correspondence: Mahalakshmi Sivasankar, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, E-mail: msivasankar{at}purdue.edu, Phone: (765) 496 6628, Fax: (765) 494 0771

Purpose: Voice problems are reportedly a frequent side-effect of inhaled combination (IC) treatments. The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate whether IC treatments are detrimental to phonation. We hypothesized that IC but not sham treatment would significantly increase phonation threshold pressure (PTP) and perceived phonatory effort (PPE).

Methods: Fourteen healthy adults participated in a repeated-measures design over two experimental days where they received IC and sham treatments in counterbalanced order. PTP and PPE were collected prior to, and immediately, 1-hour, and 2-hours following IC and sham treatment.

Results: IC but not sham treatment increased PTP. The increase in PTP was maintained for 2-hours following administration. PPE ratings were not significantly correlated with PTP.

Conclusions: IC treatments can have acute, adverse effects on phonation. Detrimental phonatory effects were elicited in participants with no self-reported voice problems. IC treatments are being increasingly prescribed across the lifespan. The current data increase our understanding of the nature of phonatory deterioration associated with IC treatment, and lay the groundwork for increased research effort to develop IC treatments that effectively control respiratory disease while minimizing an effect on phonation.

KEY WORDS: inhaled combination treatments, corticosteroids, beta-agonists, voice problems


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.