JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JSLHR Papers in Press
Published online July 27, 2009

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009; doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0220)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text ([PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hazan, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shakespeare, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hazan, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shakespeare, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true deficit?

Valerie Hazan
Souhila Messaoud-Galusi
Stuart Rosen

Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, UCL, London, UK

Suzan Nouwens
Institute of Linguistics OTS, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Bethanie Shakespeare
Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, UCL, London, UK

Corresponding Author: Prof. Valerie Hazan, UCL Department of Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, UCL, Chandler House, 2, Wakefield Street, London London WC1N 1PF, Tel: + 44 20 7679 4076, Fax: + 44 (0) 207 679 4010

Purpose: This study investigated whether adults with dyslexia show evidence of a consistent speech perception deficit by testing phoneme categorization and word perception in noise.

Method: Seventeen adults with dyslexia and 20 average readers underwent a test battery including standardized reading, language and phonological awareness tests, and tests of speech perception. Categorization of a ‘pea’/‘bee’ voicing contrast was evaluated using adaptive identification and discrimination tasks, presented in quiet and in noise, and a fixed-step discrimination task. Two further tests of word perception in noise were presented.

Results: There were no significant group differences for categorization in quiet or noise, for across- and within-category discrimination as measured adaptively, or word perception, but average-readers showed better across- and within-category discrimination in the fixed-step discrimination. Individuals did not show consistent poor performance across related tasks.

Conclusions: The small number of group differences, and lack of consistent poor individual performance, suggests weak support for a speech perception deficit in dyslexia. It seems likely that at least some poor performances are attributable to non-sensory factors like attention. It may also be that some individuals with dyslexia have speech perceptual acuity that is at the lower end of the normal range and exacerbated by non-sensory factors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.