JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JSLHR Papers in Press
Published online August 28, 2009

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009; doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0116)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text ([PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreatta, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barlow, S. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreatta, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barlow, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Somatosensory Gating is Dependent on the Rate of Force Recruitment in the Human Orofacial System

Richard D. Andreatta
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Steven M. Barlow
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences and Disorders, Programs in Neuroscience, Human Biology, and Bioengineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

Purpose: Functional orofacial behaviors vary in their force end-point and rate of recruitment. This study assessed the gating of orofacial cutaneous somatosensation during different cyclic lip force recruitment rates. Understanding how differences in the rate of force recruitment influences trigeminal system function is an important step toward furthering our knowledge of orofacial sensorimotor control.

Method: Lower lip vibrotactile thresholds (LL-VDT) were sampled in response to sinusoidal inputs delivered to the lip vermilion at 5, 10, 50, and 150 Hz while adult subjects engaged in a baseline condition (no force), two low-level lip force recruitment tasks differing by rate (0.1 Hz or 2 Hz), and passive displacement of the lip as a control to approximate the mechanosensory consequences of voluntary movement.

Results: LL-VDT's increased significantly for test frequencies at or below 50 Hz during voluntary lip force recruitment. LL-VDT shifts were positively related to changes in the rate of lip force recruitment, whereas passively imposed displacements of the lip were ineffective in shifting LL-VDT's.

Conclusions: These findings are considered in relation to published reports of force-related sensory gating in orofacial and limb systems and the potential role of somatosensory gating along the trigeminal system during orofacial behaviors.

KEY WORDS: mechanoreceptor, psychophysics, perception, lips, vibrotactile, trigeminal


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.